Current treatments of Parkinson’s disease (PD) have limited efficacy in alleviating freezing of gait (FoG). In this context, concomitant deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) has been suggested as a potential therapeutic approach. However, the mechanisms underlying this approach are unknown. While the current rationale relies on network-based hypotheses of intensified disinhibition of brainstem locomotor areas to facilitate the release of gait motor programs, it is still unclear how simultaneous high-frequency DBS in two interconnected basal ganglia nuclei affects large-scale cortico-subcortical network activity. Here, we use a basic model of neural excitation, the susceptible-excited-refractory (SER) model, to compare effects of different stimulation modes of the network underlying FoG based on the mouse brain connectivity atlas. We develop a network-based computational framework to compare subcortical DBS targets through exhaustive analysis of the brain attractor dynamics in the healthy, PD, and DBS states. We show that combined STN+SNr DBS outperforms STN DBS in terms of the normalization of spike propagation flow in the FoG network. The framework aims to move toward a mechanistic understanding of the network effects of DBS and may be applicable to further perturbation-based therapies of brain disorders. Author Summary Parkinson’s disease patients with freezing of gait (FoG) may be treated by deep brain stimulation, which produces effects mediated by brain networks. Currently, the approach of combined DBS of the subthalamic nucleus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata is investigated for being particularly beneficial for patients with axial symptoms, but the exact mechanisms of this effect are unknown. Here, we present a network-based computational framework using a basic excitable model that enables us to simulate the complete activity patterns of the brain network involved in FoG. These simulations reveal network mechanisms underlying STN+SNr DBS and its efficacy in alleviating FoG. The proposed framework can capture the influence of the DBS target sites on cortico-subcortical networks and help to identify suitable stimulation targets.

The anatomical wiring of the brain is a central focus in network neuroscience. Diffusion MRI tractography offers the unique opportunity to investigate the brain fiber architecture in vivo and noninvasively. However, its reliability is still highly debated. Here, we explored the ability of diffusion MRI tractography to match invasive anatomical tract-tracing connectivity data of the ferret brain. We also investigated the influence of several state-of-the-art tractography algorithms on this match to ground truth connectivity data. Tract-tracing connectivity data were obtained from retrograde tracer injections into the occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices of adult ferrets. We found that the relative densities of projections identified from the anatomical experiments were highly correlated with the estimates from all the studied diffusion tractography algorithms (Spearman’s rho ranging from 0.67 to 0.91), while only small, nonsignificant variations appeared across the tractography algorithms. These results are comparable to findings reported in mouse and monkey, increasing the confidence in diffusion MRI tractography results. Moreover, our results provide insights into the variations of sensitivity and specificity of the tractography algorithms, and hence into the influence of choosing one algorithm over another. Author Summary In this article we used tract-tracing data as a gold standard to validate the use of diffusion MRI tractography for inferring structural connectivity in the ferret brain as well as for assessing the influence of several state-of-the-art tractography algorithms on the inferred connections. We found high correspondence between diffusion MRI tractography and tract-tracing with little differences between the explored algorithms. We conclude that diffusion MRI tractography provides a worthwhile whole-brain estimate of structural connectivity that can be employed in further anatomical, developmental, and computational studies of the ferret brain.

Author Summary The self-organization of modular structure in brain networks is mechanistically poorly understood. We propose a simple plasticity model based on a fundamental principle, topological reinforcement, which promotes connections between nodes with high neighborhood similarity. Starting from a random network, this mechanism systematically promotes the emergence of modular architecture by enhancing initial weak proto-modules. Furthermore, we show that this topological selection principle can also be implemented in biological neural networks through a Hebbian plasticity rule, where what “fires together, wires together” and, under proper conditions, the results are consistent between both scenarios. We propose the topological reinforcement as a principle contributing to the emergence of modular structure in brain networks. This addresses the gap between previous pure generative and activity-based models of modularity emergence in brain networks, offering a common underlying principle at the topological level. Abstract Modularity is a ubiquitous topological feature of structural brain networks at various scales. Although a variety of potential mechanisms have been proposed, the fundamental principles by which modularity emerges in neural networks remain elusive. We tackle this question with a plasticity model of neural networks derived from a purely topological perspective. Our topological reinforcement model acts enhancing the topological overlap between nodes, that is, iteratively allowing connections between non-neighbor nodes with high neighborhood similarity. This rule reliably evolves synthetic random networks toward a modular architecture. Such final modular structure reflects initial “proto-modules,” thus allowing to predict the modules of the evolved graph. Subsequently, we show that this topological selection principle might be biologically implemented as a Hebbian rule. Concretely, we explore a simple model of excitable dynamics, where the plasticity rule acts based on the functional connectivity (co-activations) between nodes. Results produced by the activity-based model are consistent with the ones from the purely topological rule in terms of the final network configuration and modules composition. Our findings suggest that the selective reinforcement of topological overlap may be a fundamental mechanism contributing to modularity emergence in brain networks.