What do novices think about the negotiation process? Though scholars have assumed that negotiators rely on cognitive scripts to guide their behavior in negotiation, scant empirical evidence documents the existence and content of these scripts. A sample of novice negotiators listed all the actions that they believed constituted successful negotiation. The findings indicate that people have a socially‐shared sense of the appropriate sequence of behaviors for negotiating. Closer scrutiny, however, shows that many of these behaviors are associated with poor negotiated outcomes. Specifically, an investigation of the content of these scripts shows that novices believe that incompatible interests, sequential issue settlement, impasses, and competitive behavior are common to the negotiation process.

Abelson
,
R.P.
1981
.
Psychological status of the script concept
.
American Psychologist
36
:
715
729
.
Bazerman
,
M.H.
and
J.S.
Carroll
1987
.
Negotiator cognition
. In
Research in organizational behavior
, vol.
9
, edited by
L. L.
Cummings
and
B. M.
Staw
.
Greenwich, Conn
. :
JAI Press
.
Bower
,
G.H.
,
J.B.
Black
and
T.J.
Turner
1979
.
Scripts in memory for text
.
Cognitive Psychology
11
:
177
120
.
Brett
,
J.M.
,
W.
Adair
,
A.
Lempereur
,
T.
Okumura
,
P.
Shikhirev
,
C.
Tinsley
, and
A.
Lytle
1998
.
Culture and joint gains in negotiation
.
Negotiation Journal
14
:
61
86
.
Brett
,
J. M.
and
T.
Okumura
1998
.
Inter‐ and intracultural negotiation: U.S. and Japanese negotiators
.
Academy of Management Journal
41
:
495
510
.
Carroll
,
J.S.
and
J.W.
Payne
1991
.
An information processing approach to two‐party negotiations
. In
Research on negotiation in organizations: Handbook of negotiation research
, vol.
3
, edited by
M.H.
.
Bazerman
,
R.J.
Lewicki
, and
B.H.
Sheppard
.
Greenwich, Conn
. :
JAI Press
.
Fisher
,
R.
,
W.
Ury
, and
B.
Patton
1991
.
Getting to YES
. 2d Ed.
New York
:
Penguin Books
.
Mannix
,
E.A.
,
L.L.
Thompson
, and
M.H.
Bazerman
1989
.
Negotiation in small groups
.
Journal of Applied Psychology
74
:
508
517
.
Mikolic
,
J.M.
,
J.C.
Parker
, and
D.G.
Pruitt
1995
.
Escalation in response to persistent annoyance
:
Groups vs. individuals and gender effects. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York at Buffalo
.
Neale
,
M.A.
and
M.H.
Bazerman
1991
.
Cognition and rationality in negotiation
.
New York
:
Free Press
.
Neale
,
M.A.
and
G.B.
Northcraft
1986
.
Experts, amateurs, and refrigerators: Comparing expert and amateur negotiators in a novel task
.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
38
:
305
317
.
Nottenburg
,
G.
and
E.J.
Shoben
1980
.
Scripts as linear orders
.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
16
:
329
347
.
Pruitt
,
D.G.
1995
.
Networks and collective scripts: Paying attention to structure in bargaining theory
. In
Negotiation as a social process
, edited by
R. M.
Kramer
and
D.M.
Messick
.
Thousand Oaks, Calif
. :
Sage
.
Pryor
,
J.B.
and
T.V.
Merluzzi
1985
.
The role of expertise in processing social interaction scripts
.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
21
:
362
379
.
Schank
,
R.C.
and
R.P.
Abelson
1977
.
Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures
.
Hillsdale, N.J.
:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
.
Thompson
,
L.
1990
.
Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues
.
Psychological Bulletin
108
:
515
532
.
Thompson
,
L.
and
T.
DeHarpport
1994
.
Social judgment, feedback, and interpersonal learning in negotiation
.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
58
:
327
345
.
Thompson
,
L.
and
R.
Hastie
1990
.
Social perception in negotiation
.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
47
:
98
123
.
Van
Boven
,
L.
and
L.
Thompson
1999
.
A look into the mind of the negotiator: Mental models in negotiation
.
Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University
.
Wilson
,
T.D.
and
J.A.
Capitman
1982
.
Effects of script availability on social behavior
.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
8
:
11
19
.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.