Lexical Processing Strongly Affects Reading Times But Not Skipping During Natural Reading | Citedby Results | Open Mind | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Lexical Processing Strongly Affects Reading Times But Not Skipping During Natural Reading

Open Mind (2023) 7: 757–783.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

A beginner’s guide to eye tracking for psycholinguistic studies of reading

Elizabeth R. Schotter
Brian Dillon

Behavior Research Methods (2025) 57 (2)

Parafoveal N400 effects reveal that word skipping is associated with deeper lexical processing in the presence of context-driven expectations

Sara Milligan
Milca Jaime Brunet
Neslihan Caliskan
Elizabeth R. Schotter

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2025) 87 (1): 76.

Moving beyond word frequency based on tally counting: AI-generated familiarity estimates of words and phrases are an interesting additional index of language knowledge

Marc Brysbaert
Gonzalo Martínez
Pedro Reviriego

Behavior Research Methods (2024) 57 (1)

The use of eye movement corpora in vocabulary research

Marc Brysbaert
Denis Drieghe

Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (2024) 3 (1): 100093.

The Role of Real-World Statistical Regularities in Visual Perception

Diane M. Beck
Evan G. Center
Zhenan Shao

Current Directions in Psychological Science (2024) 33 (5): 317.

Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors

Jiangtian Li
Blair C. Armstrong

Cognitive Science (2024) 48 (3)