Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Winter 2002
December 01 2002
Comments on the Precarious Relationship between History and Philosophy of Science
Richard M. Burian
Richard M. Burian
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard M. Burian
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Online ISSN: 1530-9274
Print ISSN: 1063-6145
© 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2003
Perspectives on Science (2002) 10 (4): 398–407.
Citation
Richard M. Burian; Comments on the Precarious Relationship between History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 2002; 10 (4): 398–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/106361402322288039
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
Norm-Establishing and Norm-Following in Autonomous Agency
Artif Life (January,2014)
Related Book Chapters
BigDog, or, The Precarious Aesthetics of Tumbling
Aesthetics Equals Politics: New Discourses across Art, Architecture, and Philosophy
Women as Vulnerable: Precariousness in the Face of Climate Change
Women and Climate Change: Examining Discourses from the Global North
Crisis Situations, Precarious Milieus, Liminal Actors
On Hitler's Mein Kampf: The Poetics of National Socialism
Precarious Labor and Radical Care in Libraries and Digital Humanities
Knowledge Justice: Disrupting Library and Information Studies through Critical Race Theory