Abstract
In this paper I respond to the criticisms of Helen Longino, Alan Richardson, Naomi Oreskes and Sharyn Clough. There is discussion of the character of social knowledge, the goals of scientific inquiry, the connections between Social Empiricism and other approaches in science studies, productive and unproductive dissent, and the distinction between empirical and nonempirical decision vectors.
This content is only available as a PDF.
© 2008 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2008
You do not currently have access to this content.