This article, the second of a tandem study of the Chomskyan revolution (the first is in the spring issue of Perspectives on Science), charts the increasingly antagonistic rhetoric of the Chomskyan program in the late fifties and early sixties. Chomsky began emphasizing the cognitive (a.k.a. “mentalist”) aspects of his program, along with a rationalist epistemology, both of which were anathema to the Bloomfieldians. He championed an anti-Bloomfieldian approach to phonology. Further, he insisted that neither the transformation nor the semantic inroads it promised could be adopted without also adopting the cognitive, rationalist framework and rejecting Bloomfieldian phonology.
Skip Nav Destination
January 06 1994
The Chomskyan Revolution II: Sturm und Drang
R. Allen Harris
University of Waterloo
Online Issn: 1530-9274
Print Issn: 1063-6145
©1994 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
Perspectives on Science (1994) 2 (2): 176–230.
- Share Icon Share
- Views Icon Views
- Search Site
R. Allen Harris; The Chomskyan Revolution II: Sturm und Drang. Perspectives on Science 1994; 2 (2): 176–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00456
Download citation file: