This article continues the discussion, begun in an earlier contribution to Perspectives on Science, of recent arguments over the coherence of Newton’s physics. The arguments turn on his use of the term “force” in two apparently different ways in the second law. This ambiguity remains because Newton conceived of mathematics in two entirely different waysthe first as a way of describing how things are in themselves, the second (more positivistic and hypothetical) as a method of approximation. These two conceptions were, in turn, reflections of how, according to Newton, one stands in relation to two ideas of GodGod as pure being and God as will.

This content is only available as a PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.