Conceptual Clarification and Policy-Related Science: The Case of Chemical Hormesis | Citedby Results | Perspectives on Science | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Conceptual Clarification and Policy-Related Science: The Case of Chemical Hormesis

Perspectives on Science (2000) 8 (4): 346–366.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Non-cognitive Values and Methodological Learning in the Decision-Oriented Sciences

Oliver Todt
José Luis Luján

Foundations of Science (2017) 22 (1): 215.

A Perspective on the Scientific, Philosophical, and Policy Dimensions of Hormesis

George R. Hoffmann

Dose-Response (2009) 7 (1): dose-response.0.

A case for deliberation in response to hormesis research

KC Elliott

Human & Experimental Toxicology (2008) 27 (7): 529.

The hormesis concept and risk assessment: are there unique ethical and policy considerations?

GR Hoffmann
WE Stempsey

Human & Experimental Toxicology (2008) 27 (8): 613.

Elliott’s Ethics of Expertise Proposal and Application: A Dangerous Precedent

Edward J. Calabrese

Science and Engineering Ethics (2007) 13 (2): 139.

An ethics of expertise based on informed consent

Kevin C. Elliott

Science and Engineering Ethics (2006) 12 (4): 637.

A Novel Account of Scientific Anomaly: Help for the Dispute over Low-Dose Biochemical Effects

Kevin C. Elliott

Philosophy of Science (2006) 73 (5): 790.

Scientific foundations of hormesis

Lucas Reijnders

Journal of Cleaner Production (2002) 10 (6): 609.