Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations | Citedby Results | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations

Quantitative Science Studies (2023) 4 (1): 44–67.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Predatory Journals als neue Anbieter im Markt für wissenschaftliche Publikationen: Eine (ordnungs-)ökonomische Sicht

Frank Daumann
Florian Follert

ORDO (2024)

How metric-based performance evaluation systems fuel the growth of questionable publications?

Onur Öztürk
Zehra Taşkın

Scientometrics (2024) 129 (5): 2729.

The Chinese Early Warning Journal List: Strengths, weaknesses and solutions in the light of China's global scientific rise

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Serhii Nazarovets
Timothy Daly
Graham Kendall

The Journal of Academic Librarianship (2024) 50 (4): 102898.

Digital divide and digitalization in Europe: A bibliometric analysis

Natasa Kovac
Katarzyna Żmija
Jewel Kumar Roy
Rafał Kusa
Jerzy Duda

Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy (2024) 19 (2): 463.

Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited

Dimity Stephen

Scientometrics (2023) 128 (8): 4509.