Is “the time ripe” for quantitative research on misconduct in science? | Citedby Results | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Is “the time ripe” for quantitative research on misconduct in science?

Quantitative Science Studies (2020) 1 (3): 945–958.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Journal editors and publishers’ legal obligations with respect to medical research misconduct

Naomi Holbeach
Ian Freckelton AO QC
Ben W Mol

Research Ethics 174701612211474.

Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers

Matthias Kaiser
Laura Drivdal
Johs Hjellbrekke
Helene Ingierd
Ole Bjørn Rekdal

Science and Engineering Ethics (2022) 28 (1)

Sentencing social psychology: Scientific deviance and the diffusion of statistical rules

Julien Larregue

Current Sociology 001139212211176.

“Garbage in, garbage out” revisited: What do machine learning application papers report about human-labeled training data?

R. Stuart Geiger
Dominique Cope
Jamie Ip
Marsha Lotosh
Aayush Shah
Jenny Weng
Rebekah Tang

Quantitative Science Studies (2021) 2 (3): 795.

Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers

Robin Haunschild
Lutz Bornmann

Scientometrics (2021) 126 (6): 5181.

Bridging the divide between qualitative and quantitative science studies

Loet Leydesdorff
Ismael Ràfols
Staša Milojević

Quantitative Science Studies (2020) 1 (3): 918.