Coronavirus research before 2020 is more relevant than ever, especially when interpreted for COVID-19 | Citedby Results | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Coronavirus research before 2020 is more relevant than ever, especially when interpreted for COVID-19

Quantitative Science Studies (2020) 1 (4): 1381–1395.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields

Gabriela F. Nane
Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
François van Schalkwyk
Daniel Torres-Salinas

Scientometrics (2023) 128 (1): 345.

Tracking Openness and Topic Evolution of COVID-19 Publications January 2020-March 2021: Comprehensive Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis

Maider San Torcuato
Núria Bautista-Puig
Olatz Arrizabalaga
Eva Méndez

Journal of Medical Internet Research (2022) 24 (10): e40011.

Destigmatizing public health concerns and supply of COVID-19 vaccines

Sarah Akel
Fatin Bleibel
Genevieve Hale
Nile M. Khanfar

Health Marketing Quarterly (2021) 38 (2-3): 91.

How Has Covid-19 Affected Published Academic Research? A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Mentioning the Virus

Mike Thelwall
Saheeda Thelwall

Journal of Data and Information Science (2021) 6 (4): 1.

BIP4COVID19: Releasing impact measures for articles relevant to COVID-19

Thanasis Vergoulis
Ilias Kanellos
Serafeim Chatzopoulos
Danae Pla Karidi
Theodore Dalamagas

Quantitative Science Studies (2021) 2 (4): 1447.

Tracking and Mining the COVID-19 Research Literature

Alan L. Porter
Yi Zhang
Ying Huang
Mengjia Wu

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (2020) 5