A comparison of large-scale science models based on textual, direct citation and hybrid relatedness | Citedby Results | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

A comparison of large-scale science models based on textual, direct citation and hybrid relatedness

Quantitative Science Studies (2020) 1 (4): 1570–1585.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Comparison of text-based and linked-based metrics in terms of estimating the similarity of articles

Marzieh Goltaji
Javad Abbaspour
Abdolrasool Jowkar
Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 096100062311657.

Combining Citation Network Information and Text Similarity for Research Article Recommender Systems

Julia A. Sterling
Matthew M. Montemore

IEEE Access (2022) 10: 16.

An improved practical approach to forecasting exceptional growth in research

Kevin W. Boyack
Richard Klavans

Quantitative Science Studies (2022) 3 (3): 672.

Improving overlay maps of science: Combining overview and detail

Peter Sjögårde

Quantitative Science Studies (2022) 3 (4): 1097.

Tracing the context in disciplinary classifications: A bibliometric pairwise comparison of five classifications of journals in the social sciences and humanities

Linda Sīle
Raf Guns
Frédéric Vandermoere
Gunnar Sivertsen
Tim C. E. Engels

Quantitative Science Studies (2021) 2 (1): 65.

A detailed open access model of the PubMed literature

Kevin W. Boyack
Caleb Smith
Richard Klavans

Scientific Data (2020) 7 (1)