A comparison of large-scale science models based on textual, direct citation and hybrid relatedness | Citedby Results | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

A comparison of large-scale science models based on textual, direct citation and hybrid relatedness

Quantitative Science Studies (2020) 1 (4): 1570–1585.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Comparison of text-based and linked-based metrics in terms of estimating the similarity of articles

Marzieh Goltaji
Javad Abbaspour
Abdolrasool Jowkar
Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (2024) 56 (3): 760.

Normalization of direct citations for clustering in publication-level networks: evaluation of six approaches

Peter Sjögårde
Per Ahlgren

Scientometrics (2024) 129 (3): 1949.

Combining Citation Network Information and Text Similarity for Research Article Recommender Systems

Julia A. Sterling
Matthew M. Montemore

IEEE Access (2022) 10: 16.

An improved practical approach to forecasting exceptional growth in research

Kevin W. Boyack
Richard Klavans

Quantitative Science Studies (2022) 3 (3): 672.

Improving overlay maps of science: Combining overview and detail

Peter Sjögårde

Quantitative Science Studies (2022) 3 (4): 1097.

Tracing the context in disciplinary classifications: A bibliometric pairwise comparison of five classifications of journals in the social sciences and humanities

Linda Sīle
Raf Guns
Frédéric Vandermoere
Gunnar Sivertsen
Tim C. E. Engels

Quantitative Science Studies (2021) 2 (1): 65.

A detailed open access model of the PubMed literature

Kevin W. Boyack
Caleb Smith
Richard Klavans

Scientific Data (2020) 7 (1)