Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis | Citedby Results | Quantitative Science Studies | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis

Quantitative Science Studies (2021) 2 (1): 225–253.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Sex differences in scientific productivity and impact are largely explained by the proportion of highly productive individuals: a whole-population study of researchers across six disciplines in Sweden

Guy Madison
Knut Sundell

Studies in Higher Education 1.

Research patterns in communication (2009–2019): testing female representation and productivity differences, within the most cited authors and the field

Manuel Goyanes
Márton Demeter
Aurea Grané
Tamás Tóth
Homero Gil de Zúñiga

Scientometrics (2023) 128 (1): 137.

Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler

Yves Gingras

Quantitative Science Studies (2022) 3 (1): 315.

Bibliographic analysis: the trends of gendered sustainable energy studies

L Ariyani

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (2022) 1105 (1): 012001.

Are there biases in decisions to tweet on scientific papers? A plea for conducting an experimental Twitter study. Technical note

Lutz Bornmann
Robin Haunschild
Alexander Tekles

El Profesional de la información (2022)

Values matter in science, so do facts: Response to Gingras

Kyle Siler

Quantitative Science Studies (2022) 3 (2): 485.

L’Affaire Strumia reveals troubling gatekeeping values and outcomes at Quantitative Science Studies

Kyle Siler

Quantitative Science Studies (2021) 2 (3): 1119.