Skip to Main Content

Advertisement

MIT Press Direct, home
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Asset Integration and Attitudes toward Risk: Theory and Evidence

The Review of Economics and Statistics (2018) 100 (5): 816–830.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges
  • Glenn W. Harrison
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review (2024) 49 (1): 127.
Background Risk and Small-Stakes Risk Aversion
  • Xiaosheng Mu
  • Luciano Pomatto
  • Philipp Strack
  • Omer Tamuz
American Economic Review: Insights (2024) 6 (2): 262.
Risk preference and entrepreneurial investment at the top of the wealth distribution
  • Frank M. Fossen
  • Johannes König
  • Carsten Schröder
Empirical Economics (2024) 66 (2): 735.
Risk behavior among farmers: examining expected utility and prospect theory approach
  • Raghavendra Kushawaha
  • Naresh Kumar Sharma
Journal of Social and Economic Development (2024)
CONSTANT DISCOUNTING, TEMPORAL INSTABILITY, AND DYNAMIC INCONSISTENCY IN DENMARK: A LONGITUDINAL FIELD EXPERIMENT
  • Glenn W. Harrison
  • Morten I. Lau
  • Hong Il Yoo
International Economic Review (2024)
Risk Behavior among Farmers: Examining through Expected Utility and Prospect Theory Approach
  • Raghavendra Kushawaha
  • Naresh Kumar Sharma
SSRN Electronic Journal (2023)
Intertemporal planning with subjective uncertainty: anticipating your lazy, disorganized self
  • Kalyan Chatterjee
  • R Vijay Krishna
  • Barry Sopher
Oxford Open Economics (2022) 1
Mental Zooming as Variable Asset Integration in Inter-Temporal Choice
  • Stein T. Holden
  • Dag Einar Sommervoll
  • Mesfin Tilahun
International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics (2022) 11 (1): 1.
Magnitude effect in intertemporal allocation tasks
  • Chen Sun
  • Jan Potters
Experimental Economics (2022) 25 (2): 593.
Quantum decision theory augments rank-dependent expected utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory
  • Giuseppe M. Ferro
  • Tatyana Kovalenko
  • Didier Sornette
Journal of Economic Psychology (2021) 86: 102417.
The effect of information disclosure on demand for high‐load insurance
  • Marc A. Ragin
  • Benjamin L. Collier
  • Johannes G. Jaspersen
Journal of Risk and Insurance (2021) 88 (1): 161.
Experiments on the fly
  • Aleksandr Alekseev
  • James Alm
  • Vjollca Sadiraj
  • David L. Sjoquist
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2021) 186: 288.
Estimation and Comparison Between Rank-Dependent Expected Utility, Cumulative Prospect Theory and Quantum Decision Theory
  • Giuseppe Ferro
  • Tatyana Kovalenko
  • Didier Sornette
SSRN Electronic Journal (2020)
Resolving Rabin’s paradox
  • Han Bleichrodt
  • Jason N. Doctor
  • Yu Gao
  • Chen Li
  • Daniella Meeker
  • Peter P. Wakker
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (2019) 59 (3): 239.
The behavioral welfare economics of insurance
  • Glenn W. Harrison
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review (2019) 44 (2): 137.
Behavioral insurance and economic theory: A literature review
  • Glenn W. Harrison
  • Jia Min Ng
Risk Management and Insurance Review (2019) 22 (2): 133.
Risk Aversion, Loss Aversion, and the Demand for Insurance
  • Louis Eeckhoudt
  • Anna Maria Fiori
  • Emanuela Rosazza Gianin
Risks (2018) 6 (2): 60.
Measuring Multivariate Risk Preferences
  • Sebastian Ebert
  • Gijs van de Kuilen
SSRN Electronic Journal (2015)
Variation in Risk Seeking Behavior in a Natural Experiment on Large Losses Induced by a Natural Disaster
  • Lionel Page
  • David A. Savage
  • Benno Torgler
SSRN Electronic Journal (2012)

Advertisement

  • Online ISSN 1530-9142
  • Print ISSN 0034-6535
A product of The MIT Press
Newsletter sign up

MIT Press Direct

Information

MIT Press

Contact Us

© 2023 The MIT Press
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. No content on this site may be used to train artificial intelligence systems without permission in writing from the MIT Press.
Accept