Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Minh Huynh
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Are Earnings Inequality and Mobility Overstated? The Impact of Nonclassical Measurement Error
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
The Review of Economics and Statistics (2010) 92 (2): 302–315.
Published: 01 May 2010
Abstract
View articletitled, Are Earnings Inequality and Mobility Overstated? The Impact of Nonclassical Measurement Error
View
PDF
for article titled, Are Earnings Inequality and Mobility Overstated? The Impact of Nonclassical Measurement Error
Measures of inequality and mobility based on self-reported earnings reflect attributes of both the joint distribution of earnings across time and the joint distribution of measurement error and earnings. While classical measurement error would increase measures of inequality and mobility, there is substantial evidence that measurement error in earnings is not classical. In this paper, we present the analytical links between nonclassical measurement error and some summary measures of inequality and mobility. The empirical importance of nonclassical measurement error is explored using the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) matched to tax records. We find that the effects of nonclassical measurement error are large. However, these nonclassical effects are largely offsetting when estimating mobility, as measured by the intertemporal correlation in earnings. As a result, SIPP estimates of the correlation are similar to estimates based on tax records, though SIPP estimates of inequality are smaller than estimates based on tax records.