Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Ori Heffetz
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
The Review of Economics and Statistics (2019) 101 (1): 176–191.
Published: 01 March 2019
Abstract
View articletitled, Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys
View
PDF
for article titled, Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys
How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
The Review of Economics and Statistics (2011) 93 (4): 1101–1117.
Published: 01 November 2011
Abstract
View articletitled, A Test of Conspicuous Consumption: Visibility and Income Elasticities
View
PDF
for article titled, A Test of Conspicuous Consumption: Visibility and Income Elasticities
This paper shows that, consistent with a signaling-by-consuming model à la Veblen, income elasticities can be predicted from the visibility of consumer expenditures. We outline a stylized conspicuous consumption model where income elasticity is endogenously predicted to be higher if a good is visible and lower if it is not. We then develop a survey-based measure of expenditure visibility, ranking different expenditures by how noticeable they are to others. Finally, we show that our visibility measure predicts up to one-third of the observed variation in elasticities across consumption categories in U.S. data.