Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Seth Richards-Shubik
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Collaborative Production in Science: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthorships in Economics
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
The Review of Economics and Statistics (2022) 104 (6): 1241–1255.
Published: 14 November 2022
Abstract
View articletitled, Collaborative Production in Science: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthorships in Economics
View
PDF
for article titled, Collaborative Production in Science: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthorships in Economics
This paper studies productivity and preferences in scientific research. Collaboration is increasingly important for innovation in science and other domains, but we have limited understanding of the factors researchers use to choose their collaborators and the projects they work on. Here, we use a model of strategic network formation and a recently developed econometric method to examine this question in the context of economics researchers. We learn that research teams with more collaborators tend to produce papers with higher impact, and without increasing individual costs of communication and coordination. This suggests the trend toward larger research teams in economics will continue.
Includes: Supplementary data
Journal Articles
Subsidies and Structure: The Lasting Impact of the Hill-Burton Program on the Hospital Industry
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
The Review of Economics and Statistics (2017) 99 (5): 926–943.
Published: 01 December 2017
Abstract
View articletitled, Subsidies and Structure: The Lasting Impact of the Hill-Burton Program on the Hospital Industry
View
PDF
for article titled, Subsidies and Structure: The Lasting Impact of the Hill-Burton Program on the Hospital Industry
We study the effect of public subsidies from the Hill-Burton program on hospital capacity, organization of the hospital industry, and utilization. We estimate that the program accounted for a net increase of over 70,000 beds nationwide and that these effects lasted well beyond twenty years. We also show that differences in the number of hospital beds per capita between high- and low-income counties, rural and urban counties, and the South and the rest of the country fell substantially. We conclude that the program largely achieved its goals, with substantial and long-lasting effects on the U.S. hospital industry.
Includes: Supplementary data