Skip to Main Content
Table 3. 
CTG-specific contributions in both item and source memory SEMs
SEM modelRegionStructural CTGFunctional CTG
R2Parameter estimateR2Parameter estimate
Source memory model 
  Latent variable 0.82 0.52** 0.14 0.20* 
  CingHip 0.91 0.96**** 0.76 0.96**** 
  FMin 0.62 0.56**** 0.51 0.89**** 
  UF 0.61 0.53*** 0.85 0.77**** 
  Fornix 0.95 0.64**** 0.36 0.84**** 
  
Item memory model 
  Latent variable 0.39 0.32* 0.34 0.21 
  Cing 0.44 0.87**** 0.72 0.80**** 
  ILF 0.64 0.95**** 0.67 0.95**** 
  UF 0.45 0.84**** 0.59 0.86**** 
  IFOF 0.31 0.93**** 0.49 0.93**** 
SEM modelRegionStructural CTGFunctional CTG
R2Parameter estimateR2Parameter estimate
Source memory model 
  Latent variable 0.82 0.52** 0.14 0.20* 
  CingHip 0.91 0.96**** 0.76 0.96**** 
  FMin 0.62 0.56**** 0.51 0.89**** 
  UF 0.61 0.53*** 0.85 0.77**** 
  Fornix 0.95 0.64**** 0.36 0.84**** 
  
Item memory model 
  Latent variable 0.39 0.32* 0.34 0.21 
  Cing 0.44 0.87**** 0.72 0.80**** 
  ILF 0.64 0.95**** 0.67 0.95**** 
  UF 0.45 0.84**** 0.59 0.86**** 
  IFOF 0.31 0.93**** 0.49 0.93**** 

Parameter estimates are fully standardized. Cing = cingulum; CingHip = ventral leg of the cingulum; FMin = forceps minor (or genu); IFOF = inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF = inferior longitudinal fasciculus; UF = uncinate fasciculus. Significance: * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001; **** = p < 0.0001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal