Table 1.

Analysis technique
. | Firing rate
. | Kuramoto
. | Metric
. |
---|---|---|---|

Static FC | Better | Worse | Correlation between average FC of rs-fMRI and models (Figure 2) |

Point process | Better | Worse | Correlation between point process matrices of rs-fMRI and models (Figure 3) |

QPP | Tied | Tied | Correlation between the shape of extracted spatiotemporal signal between rs-fMRI and models and their rate of occurrence (Figure 4) |

K-means | Worse | Better | Number of distinct states and diversity of state transitions (Figure 6) |

RQA | Worse | Better | Average number of repeated temporal transitions and the entropy of those transitions (Figure 8) |

Analysis technique
. | Firing rate
. | Kuramoto
. | Metric
. |
---|---|---|---|

Static FC | Better | Worse | Correlation between average FC of rs-fMRI and models (Figure 2) |

Point process | Better | Worse | Correlation between point process matrices of rs-fMRI and models (Figure 3) |

QPP | Tied | Tied | Correlation between the shape of extracted spatiotemporal signal between rs-fMRI and models and their rate of occurrence (Figure 4) |

K-means | Worse | Better | Number of distinct states and diversity of state transitions (Figure 6) |

RQA | Worse | Better | Average number of repeated temporal transitions and the entropy of those transitions (Figure 8) |

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.