Skip to Main Content
Table 4:
Comparing the performance of the CONE with that of of six high performance procedures based on percentage deviation from optimal solution for the set j30 and percentage deviation from CPM lower bound for the sets j60, and j120.
Benchmark set
Reference*j30j60j120
This paper 0.00 10.64 31.65 
Chen et al., 2010  0.01 10.67 30.56 
Mobini et al., 2009  0.01 10.57 31.37 
Mendes, Gonçalves, et al., 2009  0.01 10.67 31.44 
Valls et al., 2008  0.02 10.73 31.24 
Debels et al., 2006  0.01 10.71 31.57 
Valls et al., 2005  0.01 10.74 31.58 
Benchmark set
Reference*j30j60j120
This paper 0.00 10.64 31.65 
Chen et al., 2010  0.01 10.67 30.56 
Mobini et al., 2009  0.01 10.57 31.37 
Mendes, Gonçalves, et al., 2009  0.01 10.67 31.44 
Valls et al., 2008  0.02 10.73 31.24 
Debels et al., 2006  0.01 10.71 31.57 
Valls et al., 2005  0.01 10.74 31.58 

*All with the limit of generating 50,000 schedules for each instance in each set.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal