Skip to Main Content
Table 6:
Aggregated summary of comparison results from Tables 1, 3, and 4. Number of test functions on which our methods (rows) win: lose against other competing methods (columns). Only differences that are significant with 95% confidence are counted. All counts are out of the total number of test functions, namely, 12. For all our variants the number of wins obtained by our proposed methods is larger than or equal to the number of the losses, and this is so in each individual comparison.
No. Wins: No. Losses
CEC10DECC-CGMLCCsep-CMA-ESEDA-MCC
RP-Ens (g) 6 : 3 7 : 4 7 : 3 8 : 4 8 : 4 
RP-Ens (8 : 2 7 : 3 7 : 3 8 : 4 8 : 4 
RP-Ens (sp) 5 : 3 7 : 4 7 : 5 8 : 4 8 : 4 
RP-Ens (b) 5 : 4 6 : 4 6 : 6 8 : 4 8 : 4 
No. Wins: No. Losses
CEC10DECC-CGMLCCsep-CMA-ESEDA-MCC
RP-Ens (g) 6 : 3 7 : 4 7 : 3 8 : 4 8 : 4 
RP-Ens (8 : 2 7 : 3 7 : 3 8 : 4 8 : 4 
RP-Ens (sp) 5 : 3 7 : 4 7 : 5 8 : 4 8 : 4 
RP-Ens (b) 5 : 4 6 : 4 6 : 6 8 : 4 8 : 4 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal