Skip to Main Content
Table 1.
Impact of Treatment Arms on Prevalence of IPV in Past Six Months, Post–End Line, Pooled North and South
Emotional or PhysicalEmotionalPhysicalEmotional or PhysicalEmotionalPhysical
Transfer 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 
 (0.04) (0.04) (0.03) (0.04) (0.04) (0.02) 
Transfer+BCC −0.04 −0.02 −0.06 −0.04 −0.02 −0.07 
 (0.04) (0.04) (0.03)** (0.04) (0.04) (0.03)** 
N 2,231 2,231 2,231 2,231 2,231 2,231 
Mean of control 0.67 0.63 0.27 0.67 0.63 0.27 
Strata indicator 
Extended controls    
p-value: Transfer = Transfer+BCC 0.12 0.19 0.01 0.10 0.16 0.01 
Emotional or PhysicalEmotionalPhysicalEmotional or PhysicalEmotionalPhysical
Transfer 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 
 (0.04) (0.04) (0.03) (0.04) (0.04) (0.02) 
Transfer+BCC −0.04 −0.02 −0.06 −0.04 −0.02 −0.07 
 (0.04) (0.04) (0.03)** (0.04) (0.04) (0.03)** 
N 2,231 2,231 2,231 2,231 2,231 2,231 
Mean of control 0.67 0.63 0.27 0.67 0.63 0.27 
Strata indicator 
Extended controls    
p-value: Transfer = Transfer+BCC 0.12 0.19 0.01 0.10 0.16 0.01 

Marginal effects of probit models. Extended controls include baseline characteristics of woman and husband. Standard errors clustered at village level. *p<0.1; **p<0.05; and ***p<0.01.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal