Skip to Main Content
Table 4.
Impact of Treatment Arms on Prevalence of IPV in Past Six Months, Post–End Line, North vs. South
Emotional or PhysicalEmotionalPhysical
North    
Cash −0.01 0.01 0.00 
 (0.05) (0.05) (0.03) 
Cash+BCC −0.02 0.01 −0.07 
 (0.05) (0.05) (0.04)* 
Mean of control 0.67 0.63 0.30 
p-value: Cash = Cash+BCC 0.83 0.92 0.05 
South    
Food 0.04 0.06 0.01 
 (0.06) (0.06) (0.03) 
Food+BCC −0.06 −0.05 −0.06 
 (0.05) (0.06) (0.03)* 
Mean of control 0.68 0.63 0.23 
p-value: Food = Food+BCC 0.05 0.05 0.08 
North vs. South    
p-value: Cash = Food 0.48 0.45 0.91 
p-value: Cash+BCC = Food+BCC 0.52 0.44 0.88 
Emotional or PhysicalEmotionalPhysical
North    
Cash −0.01 0.01 0.00 
 (0.05) (0.05) (0.03) 
Cash+BCC −0.02 0.01 −0.07 
 (0.05) (0.05) (0.04)* 
Mean of control 0.67 0.63 0.30 
p-value: Cash = Cash+BCC 0.83 0.92 0.05 
South    
Food 0.04 0.06 0.01 
 (0.06) (0.06) (0.03) 
Food+BCC −0.06 −0.05 −0.06 
 (0.05) (0.06) (0.03)* 
Mean of control 0.68 0.63 0.23 
p-value: Food = Food+BCC 0.05 0.05 0.08 
North vs. South    
p-value: Cash = Food 0.48 0.45 0.91 
p-value: Cash+BCC = Food+BCC 0.52 0.44 0.88 

Marginal effects of probit models. Extended controls include baseline characteristics of woman and husband. Standard errors clustered at village level. *p<0.1; **p<0.05; and ***p<0.01.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal