Skip to Main Content
Table 1:
Ranking of algorithms based on performance measures of two example problem instances from the CEC2010 problem suite.
CEC2010 problem C01 in 2 dimensions
NCHDPWPFRεFRBO
Success rate 
Mean fitness of successful runs n/a −0.365 n/a −0.362 −0.365 n/a 
Mean violation 0.320 0.179 0.314 
Algorithm Rank 
 CEC2010 problem C09 in 20 dimensions 
 NCH DP WP FR εFR BO 
Success rate 0.033 0.967 
Mean fitness of successful runs n/a n/a 0.000 n/a n/a 0.000 
Mean violation 8.650 703.648 4.187 0.278 0.257 0.037 
Algorithm Rank 
CEC2010 problem C01 in 2 dimensions
NCHDPWPFRεFRBO
Success rate 
Mean fitness of successful runs n/a −0.365 n/a −0.362 −0.365 n/a 
Mean violation 0.320 0.179 0.314 
Algorithm Rank 
 CEC2010 problem C09 in 20 dimensions 
 NCH DP WP FR εFR BO 
Success rate 0.033 0.967 
Mean fitness of successful runs n/a n/a 0.000 n/a n/a 0.000 
Mean violation 8.650 703.648 4.187 0.278 0.257 0.037 
Algorithm Rank 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal