. | Full Sample . | Evaluation Score Sample . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . |
0 years seniority | 0.222*** | 0.087*** | 0.176*** | 0.112*** | 0.040*** |
(0.013) | (0.011) | (0.013) | (0.010) | (0.008) | |
1 year seniority | 0.035*** | 0.038*** | 0.028*** | 0.009 | 0.016** |
(0.008) | (0.007) | (0.008) | (0.006) | (0.006) | |
2 years seniority | 0.063*** | 0.065*** | 0.057*** | 0.040*** | 0.046*** |
(0.009) | (0.008) | (0.009) | (0.007) | (0.007) | |
3 years seniority | 0.022* | 0.043*** | 0.017* | 0.010 | 0.032*** |
(0.009) | (0.009) | (0.008) | (0.007) | (0.008) | |
Retired teacher | 0.890*** | 0.914*** | |||
(0.018) | (0.012) | ||||
Late hire | 0.398*** | 0.327*** | |||
(0.029) | (0.030) | ||||
Licensure deficiency | 0.065*** | 0.051*** | |||
(0.010) | (0.009) | ||||
Evaluation score | −0.039*** | −0.040*** | |||
(0.003) | (0.003) | ||||
Licensure type fixed effects | Y | Y | |||
Observations | 17,409 | 17,409 | 16,211 | 16,211 | 16,211 |
. | Full Sample . | Evaluation Score Sample . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . |
0 years seniority | 0.222*** | 0.087*** | 0.176*** | 0.112*** | 0.040*** |
(0.013) | (0.011) | (0.013) | (0.010) | (0.008) | |
1 year seniority | 0.035*** | 0.038*** | 0.028*** | 0.009 | 0.016** |
(0.008) | (0.007) | (0.008) | (0.006) | (0.006) | |
2 years seniority | 0.063*** | 0.065*** | 0.057*** | 0.040*** | 0.046*** |
(0.009) | (0.008) | (0.009) | (0.007) | (0.007) | |
3 years seniority | 0.022* | 0.043*** | 0.017* | 0.010 | 0.032*** |
(0.009) | (0.009) | (0.008) | (0.007) | (0.008) | |
Retired teacher | 0.890*** | 0.914*** | |||
(0.018) | (0.012) | ||||
Late hire | 0.398*** | 0.327*** | |||
(0.029) | (0.030) | ||||
Licensure deficiency | 0.065*** | 0.051*** | |||
(0.010) | (0.009) | ||||
Evaluation score | −0.039*** | −0.040*** | |||
(0.003) | (0.003) | ||||
Licensure type fixed effects | Y | Y | |||
Observations | 17,409 | 17,409 | 16,211 | 16,211 | 16,211 |
Notes:*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Cells represent average marginal effect estimates derived from logistic regression models. Robust standard errors reported in parentheses. Principal evaluation scores are standardized in a teacher-year-level data set. These analyses include 619 RIFed teachers in 2009 and 384 RIFed teachers in 2010 for whom data on all descriptive measures other than performance are available.