Pre-university | Senior General/Pre-university | Senior General | Pre-vocational IV/Senior General | Pre-vocational IV | Pre-vocational II | Pre-vocational I/II | Pre-vocational I | |
Conditional Logit Without School Fixed Effects | ||||||||
Predicted share | 3.706*** | 3.063*** | 4.643*** | 3.062*** | 3.625*** | 2.025*** | 5.573*** | 3.642*** |
of peers | (0.586) | (0.684) | (0.595) | (0.653) | (0.625) | (0.723) | (1.192) | (0.642) |
Share of peers | 3.464*** | 4.259*** | 3.013*** | 5.127*** | 3.669*** | 4.554*** | 2.743*** | 3.131*** |
(0.485) | (0.539) | (0.465) | (0.566) | (0.509) | (0.663) | (0.988) | (0.535) | |
Conditional Logit With School Fixed Effects | ||||||||
Predicted share | 4.135*** | 3.537*** | 4.797*** | 2.659*** | 3.382*** | 1.618** | 5.108*** | 3.530*** |
of peers | (0.564) | (0.681) | (0.593) | (0.640) | (0.621) | (0.707) | (1.233) | (0.635) |
Share of peers | 3.336*** | 4.282*** | 2.916*** | 5.131*** | 3.635*** | 4.506*** | 2.741*** | 3.135*** |
(0.477) | (0.530) | (0.460) | (0.568) | (0.500) | (0.650) | (1.000) | (0.535) | |
Mixed Logit | ||||||||
Predicted share | 4.513*** | 4.022*** | 5.957*** | 4.417*** | 4.970*** | 2.786*** | 7.191*** | 3.918*** |
of peers | (0.644) | (0.785) | (0.699) | (0.862) | (0.760) | (0.838) | (1.705) | (0.783) |
Share of peers | 3.720*** | 5.721*** | 3.586*** | 6.117*** | 4.318*** | 5.654*** | 4.529*** | 3.808*** |
(0.564) | (0.649) | (0.564) | (0.742) | (0.594) | (0.831) | (1.305) | (0.718) | |
SD (predicted | 1.526 | −0.012 | 2.897 | −5.846*** | 2.063 | 3.545*** | 1.033 | −0.820 |
share of peers | (1.699) | (3.647) | (2.954) | (0.965) | (2.792) | (1.122) | (5.083) | (2.728) |
SD (share of | −1.489 | 3.965*** | −3.399 | −1.657 | −3.886** | 4.977*** | 7.189*** | −3.925*** |
peers) | (1.174) | (0.750) | (2.294) | (2.134) | (1.717) | (0.779) | (1.730) | (0.810) |
N students | 4,374 | 2,819 | 3,133 | 2,028 | 2,881 | 2,130 | 1,039 | 2,713 |
N schools | 27 | 21 | 23 | 18 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 22 |
Pre-university | Senior General/Pre-university | Senior General | Pre-vocational IV/Senior General | Pre-vocational IV | Pre-vocational II | Pre-vocational I/II | Pre-vocational I | |
Conditional Logit Without School Fixed Effects | ||||||||
Predicted share | 3.706*** | 3.063*** | 4.643*** | 3.062*** | 3.625*** | 2.025*** | 5.573*** | 3.642*** |
of peers | (0.586) | (0.684) | (0.595) | (0.653) | (0.625) | (0.723) | (1.192) | (0.642) |
Share of peers | 3.464*** | 4.259*** | 3.013*** | 5.127*** | 3.669*** | 4.554*** | 2.743*** | 3.131*** |
(0.485) | (0.539) | (0.465) | (0.566) | (0.509) | (0.663) | (0.988) | (0.535) | |
Conditional Logit With School Fixed Effects | ||||||||
Predicted share | 4.135*** | 3.537*** | 4.797*** | 2.659*** | 3.382*** | 1.618** | 5.108*** | 3.530*** |
of peers | (0.564) | (0.681) | (0.593) | (0.640) | (0.621) | (0.707) | (1.233) | (0.635) |
Share of peers | 3.336*** | 4.282*** | 2.916*** | 5.131*** | 3.635*** | 4.506*** | 2.741*** | 3.135*** |
(0.477) | (0.530) | (0.460) | (0.568) | (0.500) | (0.650) | (1.000) | (0.535) | |
Mixed Logit | ||||||||
Predicted share | 4.513*** | 4.022*** | 5.957*** | 4.417*** | 4.970*** | 2.786*** | 7.191*** | 3.918*** |
of peers | (0.644) | (0.785) | (0.699) | (0.862) | (0.760) | (0.838) | (1.705) | (0.783) |
Share of peers | 3.720*** | 5.721*** | 3.586*** | 6.117*** | 4.318*** | 5.654*** | 4.529*** | 3.808*** |
(0.564) | (0.649) | (0.564) | (0.742) | (0.594) | (0.831) | (1.305) | (0.718) | |
SD (predicted | 1.526 | −0.012 | 2.897 | −5.846*** | 2.063 | 3.545*** | 1.033 | −0.820 |
share of peers | (1.699) | (3.647) | (2.954) | (0.965) | (2.792) | (1.122) | (5.083) | (2.728) |
SD (share of | −1.489 | 3.965*** | −3.399 | −1.657 | −3.886** | 4.977*** | 7.189*** | −3.925*** |
peers) | (1.174) | (0.750) | (2.294) | (2.134) | (1.717) | (0.779) | (1.730) | (0.810) |
N students | 4,374 | 2,819 | 3,133 | 2,028 | 2,881 | 2,130 | 1,039 | 2,713 |
N schools | 27 | 21 | 23 | 18 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 22 |
Notes: Standard errors are clustered at the primary school level and reported in parentheses. All models also include indicators for school quality, lottery, and distance as in table 4. Included student level controls are gender, Dutch, missing ethnicity, test score, missing test score, student weight, and missing student weight. For the pre-vocational IV to pre-university tracks, the missing indicators could not be included in the mixed logit specification for computational reasons. When using Wald tests to compare the coefficients for the peer characteristics and the indicators for quality, lottery, and distance in conditional logit models with and without the missing indicators, it turns out that the null hypothesis of equal coefficients cannot be rejected for these levels.
***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05.