Skip to Main Content
Table 1. 

Analysis of Variance for Figure 4 Results


df
F
p
No Recovery 
Word-to-picture matching 
 Damage 10, 90 301.2 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 264.0 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 74.57 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 4.53 .0622 
Naming 
 Damage 10, 90 888.7 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 277.5 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 68.07 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 62.52 <.0001 
 
One Epoch Recovery 
Word-to-picture matching 
 Damage 10, 90 405.9 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 849.1 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 190.6 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 16.49 .003 
Naming 
 Damage 10, 90 372.1 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 692.2 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 196.0 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 119.40 <.0001 
 
Ten Epochs Recovery 
Word-to-picture matching 
 Damage 10, 90 81.85 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 257.8 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 52.81 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 5.39 .045 
Naming 
 Damage 10, 90 172.3 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 305.47 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 95.56 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 73.45 <.0001 

df
F
p
No Recovery 
Word-to-picture matching 
 Damage 10, 90 301.2 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 264.0 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 74.57 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 4.53 .0622 
Naming 
 Damage 10, 90 888.7 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 277.5 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 68.07 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 62.52 <.0001 
 
One Epoch Recovery 
Word-to-picture matching 
 Damage 10, 90 405.9 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 849.1 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 190.6 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 16.49 .003 
Naming 
 Damage 10, 90 372.1 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 692.2 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 196.0 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 119.40 <.0001 
 
Ten Epochs Recovery 
Word-to-picture matching 
 Damage 10, 90 81.85 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 257.8 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 52.81 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 5.39 .045 
Naming 
 Damage 10, 90 172.3 <.0001 
 Bilateral vs. mean unilateral 1, 9 305.47 <.0001 
 Damage * unilateral vs. bilateral 10, 90 95.56 <.0001 
 Right vs. left unilateral 1, 9 73.45 <.0001 

Two-factor repeated-measures ANOVAs treat network initializations as the random effects factor, assessing overall effect of damage extent, effect of unilateral (averaged across right and left damage) compared with bilateral damage, the interaction between damage extent and the difference between unilateral and bilateral damage, and the difference between right and left unilateral damage. Damage levels include zero to full unilateral damage over 11 increments (as in Figure 4 unilateral damage).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal