Skip to Main Content
Table 3. 

r Values for Pearson's Correlations between Rhythm Factors and Performance on Language and Cognitive Tests

Sequencing FactorSynchronization Factor
Verbal memory 
 Verbal working memory .27 (−0.19, 0.65) .11 (−0.31, 0.52) 
 STM .57 (0.23, 0.82)a .10 (−0.37, 0.49) 
Reading 
 Reading composite .47 (0.11, 0.72)a −.05 (−0.45, 0.33) 
Phonological skills 
 Rapid naming .06 (−0.36, 0.49) .05 (−0.38, 0.46) 
 Phonological awareness .02 (−0.45, 0.51) .10 (−0.33, 0.49) 
Auditory temporal resolution 
 Backward masking −.22 (−0.58, 0.35) .42 (0.02, 0.70)a 
Sequencing FactorSynchronization Factor
Verbal memory 
 Verbal working memory .27 (−0.19, 0.65) .11 (−0.31, 0.52) 
 STM .57 (0.23, 0.82)a .10 (−0.37, 0.49) 
Reading 
 Reading composite .47 (0.11, 0.72)a −.05 (−0.45, 0.33) 
Phonological skills 
 Rapid naming .06 (−0.36, 0.49) .05 (−0.38, 0.46) 
 Phonological awareness .02 (−0.45, 0.51) .10 (−0.33, 0.49) 
Auditory temporal resolution 
 Backward masking −.22 (−0.58, 0.35) .42 (0.02, 0.70)a 

Positive values indicate that better rhythm performance was linked to better language performance.

a

Indicates rejection of the null hypothesis, based on 99.75% confidence intervals (displayed inside parentheses).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal