Skip to Main Content
Table 2. 

Bayesian Paired Samples t Tests Comparing the Effects of Stimulation on the RTs of Target Detection

      BF10 Error % 
  simD       
Sham versus RH anodal/LH cathodal 1.449 <0.00001 
Sham versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 5.173 0.002 
RH anodal/LH cathodal versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 0.228 0.027 
  salD       
Sham versus RH anodal/LH cathodal 0.375 0.023 
Sham versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 4.223 0.002 
RH anodal/LH cathodal versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 0.314 0.026 
  noD       
Sham versus RH anodal/LH cathodal 0.370 0.023 
Sham versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 3.942 0.002 
RH anodal/LH cathodal versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 0.290 0.026 
      BF10 Error % 
  simD       
Sham versus RH anodal/LH cathodal 1.449 <0.00001 
Sham versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 5.173 0.002 
RH anodal/LH cathodal versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 0.228 0.027 
  salD       
Sham versus RH anodal/LH cathodal 0.375 0.023 
Sham versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 4.223 0.002 
RH anodal/LH cathodal versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 0.314 0.026 
  noD       
Sham versus RH anodal/LH cathodal 0.370 0.023 
Sham versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 3.942 0.002 
RH anodal/LH cathodal versus LH anodal/RH cathodal 0.290 0.026 

simD = similar distractor condition; salD = salient distractor condition; noD = no distractor condition. Boldface indicates evidence in support of the alternative hypothesis.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal