Table 15
End-to-end results for our negation system, using the SVM cue classifier and the combination of subtree ranking and dependency-based rules for scope resolution, comparing with Morante et al. (2009b).
| Scope Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | Configuration | Prec | Rec | F1 |
 | Morante et al. (2009b) | 66.31 | 65.27 | 65.79 |
| Cue classifier & Scope Rules + Ranking | 69.30 | 72.89 | 71.05 | |
 | Morante et al. (2009b) | 42.49 | 39.10 | 40.72 |
| Cue classifier & Scope Rules + Ranking | 58.58 | 68.09 | 62.98 | |
 | Morante et al. (2009b) | 74.03 | 70.54 | 72.25 |
| Cue classifier & Scope Rules + Ranking | 89.62 | 89.41 | 89.52 | |
| Scope Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | Configuration | Prec | Rec | F1 |
| | Morante et al. (2009b) | 66.31 | 65.27 | 65.79 |
| Cue classifier & Scope Rules + Ranking | 69.30 | 72.89 | 71.05 | |
| | Morante et al. (2009b) | 42.49 | 39.10 | 40.72 |
| Cue classifier & Scope Rules + Ranking | 58.58 | 68.09 | 62.98 | |
| | Morante et al. (2009b) | 74.03 | 70.54 | 72.25 |
| Cue classifier & Scope Rules + Ranking | 89.62 | 89.41 | 89.52 | |