Skip to Main Content
Table 13 

Quantitative analysis for performance of annotation adaptation on dependency parsing. The dependency edges are grouped according to POS tag pairs, and for each group, the recall values of baseline and annotation adaptation are reported. To save space, only the categories with proportions of more than 1% and with performance fluctuations of more than 0.5 points are listed.

Edge TypeProportionBaselineAnno. Ada.Trend
NN→JJ 2.61 90.76 93.41 ↑ 
NN→LC 1.00 98.19 97.29 ↓ 
NN→M 1.68 83.48 87.43 ↑ 
NN→NR 3.14 79.82 83.86 ↑ 
NN→P 2.31 85.49 84.83 ↓ 
NN→PU 3.15 75.71 76.39 ↑ 
NN→VV 1.89 64.64 71.81 ↑ 
VC→PU 1.33 67.87 70.13 ↑ 
VE→NN 1.07 77.80 82.86 ↑ 
VV→AD 5.55 81.69 83.00 ↑ 
VV→DEC 1.76 93.82 94.51 ↑ 
VV→NN 11.36 78.85 82.02 ↑ 
VV→NR 1.71 76.19 79.01 ↑ 
VV→PU 9.89 64.40 66.91 ↑ 
VV→VV 7.72 59.74 62.21 ↑ 
Edge TypeProportionBaselineAnno. Ada.Trend
NN→JJ 2.61 90.76 93.41 ↑ 
NN→LC 1.00 98.19 97.29 ↓ 
NN→M 1.68 83.48 87.43 ↑ 
NN→NR 3.14 79.82 83.86 ↑ 
NN→P 2.31 85.49 84.83 ↓ 
NN→PU 3.15 75.71 76.39 ↑ 
NN→VV 1.89 64.64 71.81 ↑ 
VC→PU 1.33 67.87 70.13 ↑ 
VE→NN 1.07 77.80 82.86 ↑ 
VV→AD 5.55 81.69 83.00 ↑ 
VV→DEC 1.76 93.82 94.51 ↑ 
VV→NN 11.36 78.85 82.02 ↑ 
VV→NR 1.71 76.19 79.01 ↑ 
VV→PU 9.89 64.40 66.91 ↑ 
VV→VV 7.72 59.74 62.21 ↑ 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal