Table 5

Gold partitionability estimates | Umid: proportion of mid-range (2–4) instance similarity ratings for a lemma Uiaa: inter-annotator agreement on the Usim data set (average pairwise Spearman) |

Intra-clust clusterability measures | vr, wpr, sep based on k-means clustering k estimated as comps clustering computed based on either lexsub or clls substitutes |

Inter-clust clusterability measures | comparing comps partitioning of clls with comps partitioning of lexsub comparison either through V or pF |

Baseline | average number nc_{s} of cliques clusters, computed either from lexsub or clls data |

Gold partitionability estimates | Umid: proportion of mid-range (2–4) instance similarity ratings for a lemma Uiaa: inter-annotator agreement on the Usim data set (average pairwise Spearman) |

Intra-clust clusterability measures | vr, wpr, sep based on k-means clustering k estimated as comps clustering computed based on either lexsub or clls substitutes |

Inter-clust clusterability measures | comparing comps partitioning of clls with comps partitioning of lexsub comparison either through V or pF |

Baseline | average number nc_{s} of cliques clusters, computed either from lexsub or clls data |

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.