I-Hmm-Type-R outperforms the other methods, improving performance over a random baseline by twice as much as either n-gram-R or Lattice-Type-R.
| model . | AUC . |
|---|---|
| I-Hmm-Type-R | 0.18 |
| Hmm-Type-R | 0.17 |
| Brown-Type-R-3200 | 0.16 |
| Brown-Type-R-1000 | 0.18 |
| Brown-Type-R-320 | 0.15 |
| Brown-Type-R-100 | 0.13 |
| Lattice-Type-R | 0.11 |
| n-gram-R baseline | 0.10 |
| Random baseline | 0.10 |
| model . | AUC . |
|---|---|
| I-Hmm-Type-R | 0.18 |
| Hmm-Type-R | 0.17 |
| Brown-Type-R-3200 | 0.16 |
| Brown-Type-R-1000 | 0.18 |
| Brown-Type-R-320 | 0.15 |
| Brown-Type-R-100 | 0.13 |
| Lattice-Type-R | 0.11 |
| n-gram-R baseline | 0.10 |
| Random baseline | 0.10 |