Comparison of Interventions
ExposedExposureExposedCost perTotal CostCost perTotal CostTotal Cost
AraihazarPopulationProportionPopulationGovt/NGOGovt/NGOHouseholdHouseholdper Exposure
Mitigation MethodActivityReachedReducedReduced($)($)($)($)Reduced ($)
Testing and switching 48,800 wells tested (21,300 safe) 220,000 60% 132,000 2.5 122,000   
Private intermediate wells 8,450 intermediate wells installed (7,610 safe) 67,600 90% 60,800   200 1,690,000 28 
Deep tube wells 916 deep wells installed (907 safe) 51,200 10% 5,120 800 733,000   143 
Piped water supply 312 connections installed (312 safe) 2,180 100% 2,180 250,000 250,000 300a 93,600 158 
ExposedExposureExposedCost perTotal CostCost perTotal CostTotal Cost
AraihazarPopulationProportionPopulationGovt/NGOGovt/NGOHouseholdHouseholdper Exposure
Mitigation MethodActivityReachedReducedReduced($)($)($)($)Reduced ($)
Testing and switching 48,800 wells tested (21,300 safe) 220,000 60% 132,000 2.5 122,000   
Private intermediate wells 8,450 intermediate wells installed (7,610 safe) 67,600 90% 60,800   200 1,690,000 28 
Deep tube wells 916 deep wells installed (907 safe) 51,200 10% 5,120 800 733,000   143 
Piped water supply 312 connections installed (312 safe) 2,180 100% 2,180 250,000 250,000 300a 93,600 158 

NGO = nongovernment organization.

Notes: a10 years at $2.50/month. This table presents comparisons of the effectiveness and costs of various forms of arsenic mitigation conducted in Araihazar, Bangladesh.

Source: Jamil, Nadia, Huan Feng, Kazi Ahmed, Imtiaz Choudhury, Prabhat Barnwal, and Alexander van Geen. 2019. “Effectiveness of Different Approaches to Arsenic Mitigation over 18 Years in Araihazar, Bangladesh: Implications for National Policy.” Environmental Science and Technology 53 (10): 5596–604.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal