Table 1:

Category . | Parameter . | Value . |
---|---|---|

Overall | Total no. of fitness evaluation (FE) | 512000 |

Maximal No. of FE per generation | 1024 | |

The ratio between No. of FE of | $\rho $ | |

EDASLS and GPHH per generation | ||

EDASLS | Population size | 120 |

Maximal No. of samples per generation | $\rho 1+\rho *1024-120$ | |

No. of subsegments | 2 | |

Local search probability | 0.1 | |

Bias ratio constant | 0.005 | |

GPHH | Population size | $11+\rho *1024$ |

Maximal tree depth | 8 | |

Selection | Size-7 tournament | |

Crossover/mutation/reproduction rates | 0.8 / 0.15 / 0.05 | |

Elitism | Top 10 individuals |

Category . | Parameter . | Value . |
---|---|---|

Overall | Total no. of fitness evaluation (FE) | 512000 |

Maximal No. of FE per generation | 1024 | |

The ratio between No. of FE of | $\rho $ | |

EDASLS and GPHH per generation | ||

EDASLS | Population size | 120 |

Maximal No. of samples per generation | $\rho 1+\rho *1024-120$ | |

No. of subsegments | 2 | |

Local search probability | 0.1 | |

Bias ratio constant | 0.005 | |

GPHH | Population size | $11+\rho *1024$ |

Maximal tree depth | 8 | |

Selection | Size-7 tournament | |

Crossover/mutation/reproduction rates | 0.8 / 0.15 / 0.05 | |

Elitism | Top 10 individuals |

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.