| Parametric Coefficients . | Estimate . | Std. Error . | t Value . | p Value . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.0045 | 0.0080 | 0.5651 | .5720 |
| Smooth Terms . | edf . | Ref.df . | F Value . | p Value . |
| s(SOJ) | 1.0001 | 1.0003 | 12.3827 | .0004* |
| s(SOJ accuracy) | 1.0032 | 1.0064 | 0.4280 | .5179 |
| ti(FOJ × SOJ) | 1.0016 | 1.0033 | 0.2936 | .5888 |
| ti(FOJ × SOJ Accuracy) | 2.1676 | 2.6620 | 2.2540 | .1042 |
| s(participant) | 0.0012 | 11.0000 | 0.0000 | .9994 |
| GAMM analysis: R2-locked α power, SOJ cluster, model without FOJ term | ||||
| Parametric Coefficients . | Estimate . | Std. Error . | t Value . | p Value . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.0045 | 0.0080 | 0.5651 | .5720 |
| Smooth Terms . | edf . | Ref.df . | F Value . | p Value . |
| s(SOJ) | 1.0001 | 1.0003 | 12.3827 | .0004* |
| s(SOJ accuracy) | 1.0032 | 1.0064 | 0.4280 | .5179 |
| ti(FOJ × SOJ) | 1.0016 | 1.0033 | 0.2936 | .5888 |
| ti(FOJ × SOJ Accuracy) | 2.1676 | 2.6620 | 2.2540 | .1042 |
| s(participant) | 0.0012 | 11.0000 | 0.0000 | .9994 |
| GAMM analysis: R2-locked α power, SOJ cluster, model without FOJ term | ||||
The table displays the results of the model that was based on the data collapsed across the significant sensors, showing the main effect of SOJ, when the model was fitted on a per-sensor basis and the FOJ term has been excluded from the model.
The asterisk signifies the factors that were significant after false discovery rate correction, applied after the same model was fitted for every sensor separately.