Skip to Main Content
Table 3. 
Experiment 2 Regression Results
MeasureSourcebSSMSEFpPRE
Proportion correct Between-participant 0.763 41.887 0.008 5329.753 * .987 
Linear Block 0.023 0.040 0.002 22.047 * .237 
Quadratic Block 0.001 * 0.007 0.014 .907 * 
Cubic Block 0.006 0.003 0.001 2.887 .094 .039 
Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 0.304 6.637 0.011 590.282 * .893 
Perceptual vs. Analogy 0.203 2.958 0.028 105.422 * .598 
Linear Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 0.020 0.030 0.007 4.332 .041 .058 
Linear Bock × Perceptual vs. Analogy −0.072 0.370 0.005 67.605 * .488 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System −0.148 1.577 0.048 33.160 * .318 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy 0.072 0.374 0.025 14.855 * .173 
Cubic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System −0.012 0.010 0.007 1.478 .228 .020 
Cubic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy −0.002 * 0.004 0.074 .786 .001 
Correct RT Between-participant 3560 899,928,002 2,210,954 407.03 * .853 
Linear Block 643 29,345,783 233,422 125.72 * .642 
Quadratic Block −695 34,267,984 716,922 47.80 * .406 
Cubic Block 147 1,524,606 75,138 20.29 * .225 
Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 2072 304,678,497 2,823,922 107.89 * .607 
Perceptual vs. Analogy 1973 276,523,546 2,017,098 137.09 * .662 
Linear Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System −200 2,830,433 778,895 3.63 .061 .049 
Linear Bock × Perceptual vs. Analogy 765 41,561,072 836,341 49.69 * .415 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 286 5,819,810 3,719,954 1.56 .215 .022 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy −1099 85,766,297 2,708,282 31.67 * .311 
Cubic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 24 40,787 376,437 0.11 .743 .002 
Cubic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy 46 152,896 191,734 0.80 .375 .011 
MeasureSourcebSSMSEFpPRE
Proportion correct Between-participant 0.763 41.887 0.008 5329.753 * .987 
Linear Block 0.023 0.040 0.002 22.047 * .237 
Quadratic Block 0.001 * 0.007 0.014 .907 * 
Cubic Block 0.006 0.003 0.001 2.887 .094 .039 
Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 0.304 6.637 0.011 590.282 * .893 
Perceptual vs. Analogy 0.203 2.958 0.028 105.422 * .598 
Linear Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 0.020 0.030 0.007 4.332 .041 .058 
Linear Bock × Perceptual vs. Analogy −0.072 0.370 0.005 67.605 * .488 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System −0.148 1.577 0.048 33.160 * .318 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy 0.072 0.374 0.025 14.855 * .173 
Cubic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System −0.012 0.010 0.007 1.478 .228 .020 
Cubic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy −0.002 * 0.004 0.074 .786 .001 
Correct RT Between-participant 3560 899,928,002 2,210,954 407.03 * .853 
Linear Block 643 29,345,783 233,422 125.72 * .642 
Quadratic Block −695 34,267,984 716,922 47.80 * .406 
Cubic Block 147 1,524,606 75,138 20.29 * .225 
Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 2072 304,678,497 2,823,922 107.89 * .607 
Perceptual vs. Analogy 1973 276,523,546 2,017,098 137.09 * .662 
Linear Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System −200 2,830,433 778,895 3.63 .061 .049 
Linear Bock × Perceptual vs. Analogy 765 41,561,072 836,341 49.69 * .415 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 286 5,819,810 3,719,954 1.56 .215 .022 
Quadratic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy −1099 85,766,297 2,708,282 31.67 * .311 
Cubic Block × Perceptual + Analogy vs. System 24 40,787 376,437 0.11 .743 .002 
Cubic Block × Perceptual vs. Analogy 46 152,896 191,734 0.80 .375 .011 

All effects are the intercept term; degrees of freedom for each source and error are 1 and 71 (proportion correct) and 1 and 70 (correct RT), respectively.

*

Values < .001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal