Skip to Main Content
Table 1. 
Accuracy of recalling network relationships after incidental learning.
 Network 1Network 2Both Networkst value (p)
Hit Rate .82 .83 .83 −0.13 (.89) 
SD 0.14 0.11 0.09   
False Alarm Rate .39 .47 .43 −1.23 (.23) 
SD 0.21 0.24 0.19   
d′ 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.70 (.49) 
SD 0.71 0.86 0.6   
Strength Correlation (r) .58 .53 .54 0.82 (.42) 
SD 0.25 0.21 0.21   
 Network 1Network 2Both Networkst value (p)
Hit Rate .82 .83 .83 −0.13 (.89) 
SD 0.14 0.11 0.09   
False Alarm Rate .39 .47 .43 −1.23 (.23) 
SD 0.21 0.24 0.19   
d′ 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.70 (.49) 
SD 0.71 0.86 0.6   
Strength Correlation (r) .58 .53 .54 0.82 (.42) 
SD 0.25 0.21 0.21   

Notes. Hit rate, false alarm rate, and d′ represent the accuracy of recalling the true connections within the networks. Strength correlation refers to the correlation between the matrix of true relationship strength of the faces in the networks and the behavioral judgments of strength, and is therefore a measure of accuracy of recalling relationship strength. T values and p values for paired sample two-tailed t tests between the two networks are reported at the right of the table. Bold indicates primary data, and italics indicate the standard deviation of the data.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal