Table 1.

. | Network 1
. | Network 2
. | Both Networks
. |
. t value (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|

Hit Rate | .82 | .83 | .83 | −0.13 (.89) |

SD | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.09 | |

False Alarm Rate | .39 | .47 | .43 | −1.23 (.23) |

SD | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.19 | |

d′ | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.70 (.49) |

SD | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.6 | |

Strength Correlation ( r) | .58 | .53 | .54 | 0.82 (.42) |

SD | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.21 |

. | Network 1
. | Network 2
. | Both Networks
. |
. t value (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|

Hit Rate | .82 | .83 | .83 | −0.13 (.89) |

SD | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.09 | |

False Alarm Rate | .39 | .47 | .43 | −1.23 (.23) |

SD | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.19 | |

d′ | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.70 (.49) |

SD | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.6 | |

Strength Correlation ( r) | .58 | .53 | .54 | 0.82 (.42) |

SD | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.21 |

*Notes*. Hit rate, false alarm rate, and d′ represent the accuracy of recalling the true connections within the networks. Strength correlation refers to the correlation between the matrix of true relationship strength of the faces in the networks and the behavioral judgments of strength, and is therefore a measure of accuracy of recalling relationship strength. *T* values and *p* values for paired sample two-tailed *t* tests between the two networks are reported at the right of the table. Bold indicates primary data, and italics indicate the standard deviation of the data.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.