MIT Press

Table 9.

Spearman correlations between the proportion of female first authors 1996–2012 or the proportion change from 1996 to 2012 and the female citation advantage (full regression model 1 or reduced regression model 2). Pairwise sample sizes (between 168 and 325) are in the supplementary materials

Country	Female proportion against female citation advantage (1)	Female proportion against female citation advantage (2)	Female change against female citation advantage (1)	Female change against female citation advantage (2)
Australia	.025	.013	.057	.068
Canada	−.052	−.058	.019	.027
Ireland	−.068	.005	.031	.060
New Zealand	−.197^**	−.164^**	.058	.019
United Kingdom	.010	−.048	.143^*	.098
United States	−.190^***	−.156^**	.053	.014

Country	Female proportion against female citation advantage (1)	Female proportion against female citation advantage (2)	Female change against female citation advantage (1)	Female change against female citation advantage (2)
Australia	.025	.013	.057	.068
Canada	−.052	−.058	.019	.027
Ireland	−.068	.005	.031	.060
New Zealand	−.197^**	−.164^**	.058	.019
United Kingdom	.010	−.048	.143^*	.098
United States	−.190^***	−.156^**	.053	.014

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

View Large

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only