Table 6. 
In this table, we compare Layer 4 with Layer 4 shuffled.
 No parts benefitOne part benefitsBoth parts benefit
Layer 4 80.5% 4.5% 15.0% 
Layer 4 Shuffled 89.3% 2.7% 8.0% 
p-value of difference 0.041 0.214 0.033 
p-value < 0.05 Yes No Yes 
 No parts benefitOne part benefitsBoth parts benefit
Layer 4 80.5% 4.5% 15.0% 
Layer 4 Shuffled 89.3% 2.7% 8.0% 
p-value of difference 0.041 0.214 0.033 
p-value < 0.05 Yes No Yes 

Notes. Shuffling decreases the probability that the component parts will both benefit from fusion; that is, the probability of symbiosis as persistent mutualism. The whole is fitter than both parts 15% of the time for Layer 4, but only 8% of the time for Layer 4 Shuffled. This shows that increased fitness does not come merely from the increase in area when fusing two seeds; a significant part of the increased fitness comes from the structural properties of the two seeds that are fused together. Layer 4 Shuffled is less likely to have the proper structure than Layer 4. The p-values in the table are calculated using a two-tailed Welch t-test for samples with unequal variance (heteroscedastic variance).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal