Skip to Main Content
Table 8.

Subgroup Analysis for Effect of Evaluation Probability on Announced Evaluations

Announced
ExperiencePrevious Year QualityIncentive Group
MinimallyHighly
Internal Evaluation 1First-YearVeteranEffectiveEffectiveEffectiveTestedNon-Tested
Evaluation 0.282 0.135 0.512 0.189 0.120 0.369 0.144 
Probability (Pk(0.263) (0.107) (0.492) (0.140) (0.151) (0.236) (0.132) 
Day within 0.001 −0.001 −0.002 0.001 0.002 0.000 −0.002 
evaluation window (0.003) (0.002) (0.005) (0.002) (0.002) (0.003) (0.002) 
Evaluation is 2nd 0.104* 0.114*** 0.166* 0.078** 0.121*** 0.076* 0.122*** 
 (0.057) (0.020) (0.097) (0.033) (0.033) (0.045) (0.025) 
N 897 8,579 470 3,569 2,366 1,345 5,553 
Announced
ExperiencePrevious Year QualityIncentive Group
MinimallyHighly
Internal Evaluation 1First-YearVeteranEffectiveEffectiveEffectiveTestedNon-Tested
Evaluation 0.282 0.135 0.512 0.189 0.120 0.369 0.144 
Probability (Pk(0.263) (0.107) (0.492) (0.140) (0.151) (0.236) (0.132) 
Day within 0.001 −0.001 −0.002 0.001 0.002 0.000 −0.002 
evaluation window (0.003) (0.002) (0.005) (0.002) (0.002) (0.003) (0.002) 
Evaluation is 2nd 0.104* 0.114*** 0.166* 0.078** 0.121*** 0.076* 0.122*** 
 (0.057) (0.020) (0.097) (0.033) (0.033) (0.045) (0.025) 
N 897 8,579 470 3,569 2,366 1,345 5,553 

Notes: This table provides the same estimates as in table 5 broken out by subgroup. Errors are clustered at the school-by-year level.

***Significant at the 1 percent level; **significant at the 5 percent level; *significant at the 10 percent level.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal