Comparisons of Sham and Two Active Stimulation Groups
. | . | Stimulation Group . | Group Difference . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sham (n = 22) . | Active - 1mA (n = 13) . | Active - 2mA (n = 16) . | F . | p . | ||
demographic | sex | F = 5 | F = 4 | F = 4 | NA | NA |
age | 28.1 (5.2) | 28.8 (6.2) | 27.8 (5.7) | 0.108 | .9 | |
scanning time | interval | 159.1 (16.86) | 158.9 (17.39) | 158.9 (14.45) | 0.001 | .99 |
sensation | itching | 1.73 (1.70) | 1.31 (1.18) | 1.44 (1.26) | 0.388 | .68 |
pain | 0.36 (0.85) | 0.77 (1.17) | 0.44 (0.63) | 0.906 | .41 | |
heat | 0.23 (0.43) | 0.54 (0.97) | 0.56 (0.59) | 1.173 | .32 | |
discomfort | 1.05 (1.43) | 0.85 (1.21) | 0.56 (0.73) | 0.756 | .48 | |
fatigue | 4.09 (1.02) | 3.69 (1.32) | 4.44 (1.31) | 1.396 | .26 |
. | . | Stimulation Group . | Group Difference . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sham (n = 22) . | Active - 1mA (n = 13) . | Active - 2mA (n = 16) . | F . | p . | ||
demographic | sex | F = 5 | F = 4 | F = 4 | NA | NA |
age | 28.1 (5.2) | 28.8 (6.2) | 27.8 (5.7) | 0.108 | .9 | |
scanning time | interval | 159.1 (16.86) | 158.9 (17.39) | 158.9 (14.45) | 0.001 | .99 |
sensation | itching | 1.73 (1.70) | 1.31 (1.18) | 1.44 (1.26) | 0.388 | .68 |
pain | 0.36 (0.85) | 0.77 (1.17) | 0.44 (0.63) | 0.906 | .41 | |
heat | 0.23 (0.43) | 0.54 (0.97) | 0.56 (0.59) | 1.173 | .32 | |
discomfort | 1.05 (1.43) | 0.85 (1.21) | 0.56 (0.73) | 0.756 | .48 | |
fatigue | 4.09 (1.02) | 3.69 (1.32) | 4.44 (1.31) | 1.396 | .26 |
Stimulation groups did not differ in age, scanning time, and sensation reports.