Skip to Main Content
Table 2.

Percentage of respondents indicating that a metadata field is important, compared to publisher responses (publishers are more likely to select certain metadata fields as important compared to other stakeholder groups. Differences greater than 20% in bold)

FieldPublishersLibrariansRepositoryResearchers
%%Difference from publishers%Difference from publishers%Difference from publishers
Year. & date of publication 89 57 −32% 69 −20% 86 −3% 
DOI 89 47 −43% 63 −26% 72 −17% 
Abstract 71 25 −46% 43 −29% 56 −15% 
Author(s) ORCID 54 23 −31% 45 −9% 48 −6% 
Volume / issue 46 27 −19% 20 −26% 34 −12% 
Author(s) affiliation 50 10 −40% 37 −13% 30 −20% 
ISSN 43 18 −25% 27 −16% 30 −13% 
Page numbers 39 15 −25% 16 −23% 24 −15% 
Grant ID(s) 36 −28% 37 1% 10 −26% 
Funder Name(s) 36 −27% 22 −13% 18 −18% 
Funder ID(s) 32 −26% 24 −13% 16 −18% 
FieldPublishersLibrariansRepositoryResearchers
%%Difference from publishers%Difference from publishers%Difference from publishers
Year. & date of publication 89 57 −32% 69 −20% 86 −3% 
DOI 89 47 −43% 63 −26% 72 −17% 
Abstract 71 25 −46% 43 −29% 56 −15% 
Author(s) ORCID 54 23 −31% 45 −9% 48 −6% 
Volume / issue 46 27 −19% 20 −26% 34 −12% 
Author(s) affiliation 50 10 −40% 37 −13% 30 −20% 
ISSN 43 18 −25% 27 −16% 30 −13% 
Page numbers 39 15 −25% 16 −23% 24 −15% 
Grant ID(s) 36 −28% 37 1% 10 −26% 
Funder Name(s) 36 −27% 22 −13% 18 −18% 
Funder ID(s) 32 −26% 24 −13% 16 −18% 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal