Error Rates
. | High Relatedness . | Low Relatedness . | Feature Selection . | Global Navon . | Local Navon . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFG | |||||
| No TMS | 2.00 (2.42) | 5.75 (4.91) | 17.31 (10.01) | 2.63 (3.07) | 4.75 (12.31) |
| TMS | 3.13 (2.99) | 11.25 (6.44) | 12.25 (8.51) | 1.81 (2.97) | 4.38 (3.50) |
| Difference | 1.13 (3.74) | 5.50 (8.63) | −5.06 (11.32) | −0.82 (4.82) | −0.37 (12.96) |
| pMTG | |||||
| No TMS | 2.94 (2.59) | 7.44 (6.31) | 15.06 (7.86) | 1.19 (2.04) | 3.44 (5.25) |
| TMS | 3.25 (3.66) | 11.25 (5.69) | 13.13 (8.37) | 1.50 (1.55) | 2.81 (2.48) |
| Difference | 0.31 (3.94) | 3.81 (7.47) | −1.93 (8.23) | 0.31 (2.82) | −0.63 (4.47) |
| IPS | |||||
| No TMS | 2.81 (3.97) | 9.06 (8.81) | 20.94 (10.85) | 1.81 (2.46) | 7.38 (13.16) |
| TMS | 5.38 (4.21) | 9.06 (4.93) | 15.81 (15.01) | 1.94 (2.62) | 4.00 (5.27) |
| Difference | 2.57 (6.03) | 0.00 (6.68) | −5.13 (10.76) | 0.13 (3.52) | −3.38 (13.68) |
. | High Relatedness . | Low Relatedness . | Feature Selection . | Global Navon . | Local Navon . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFG | |||||
| No TMS | 2.00 (2.42) | 5.75 (4.91) | 17.31 (10.01) | 2.63 (3.07) | 4.75 (12.31) |
| TMS | 3.13 (2.99) | 11.25 (6.44) | 12.25 (8.51) | 1.81 (2.97) | 4.38 (3.50) |
| Difference | 1.13 (3.74) | 5.50 (8.63) | −5.06 (11.32) | −0.82 (4.82) | −0.37 (12.96) |
| pMTG | |||||
| No TMS | 2.94 (2.59) | 7.44 (6.31) | 15.06 (7.86) | 1.19 (2.04) | 3.44 (5.25) |
| TMS | 3.25 (3.66) | 11.25 (5.69) | 13.13 (8.37) | 1.50 (1.55) | 2.81 (2.48) |
| Difference | 0.31 (3.94) | 3.81 (7.47) | −1.93 (8.23) | 0.31 (2.82) | −0.63 (4.47) |
| IPS | |||||
| No TMS | 2.81 (3.97) | 9.06 (8.81) | 20.94 (10.85) | 1.81 (2.46) | 7.38 (13.16) |
| TMS | 5.38 (4.21) | 9.06 (4.93) | 15.81 (15.01) | 1.94 (2.62) | 4.00 (5.27) |
| Difference | 2.57 (6.03) | 0.00 (6.68) | −5.13 (10.76) | 0.13 (3.52) | −3.38 (13.68) |
Percentage of errors committed during performance at baseline (no TMS) and after TMS (TMS) to LIFG, pMTG, and IPS for each task separately. Difference scores (TMS–no TMS) reflect the TMS effect, with positive values indicating a decline in performance after brain stimulation whereas negative values signal improvement. Standard deviation is given in parentheses.