MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Table 3.

F and p Values for the ANOVA for Error Rate

	Site	TMS	Task	Site × TMS	Site × Task	TMS × Task	Site × TMS × Task
Semantic Conditions Only (High Relatedness, Low Relatedness, Feature Selection)
df	1, 15	1, 15	2, 30	1, 15	2, 30	2, 30	2, 30
LIFG, IPS	2.89	<1	35.49	1.05	<1	6.29	2.07
p	.11	.86	<.001^a	.32	.44	.014^a	.16^a
pMTG, IPS	3.12	<1	27.75	<1	2.65	4.42	44.74
p	.10	.94	<.001	.34	.09	.036^a	.10
LIFG, pMTG	<1	<1	41.34	<1	<1	7.58	1.01
p	.70	.44	<.001^a	.89	.68	.008^a	.38

Nonsemantic Conditions Only (Global and Local NavonTask)
df	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15
LIFG, IPS	<1	<1	6.66	<1	<1	<1	<1
p	.76	.36	.02	.67	.56	.51	.51
pMTG, IPS	2.44	1.82	6.31	<1	1.27	1.30	<1
p	.14	.20	.02	.46	.28	.27	.57
LIFG, pMTG	1.49	<1	4.65	<1	<1	<1	<1
p	.24	.72	.048	.82	.77	.89	.68

	Site	TMS	Task	Site × TMS	Site × Task	TMS × Task	Site × TMS × Task
Semantic Conditions Only (High Relatedness, Low Relatedness, Feature Selection)
df	1, 15	1, 15	2, 30	1, 15	2, 30	2, 30	2, 30
LIFG, IPS	2.89	<1	35.49	1.05	<1	6.29	2.07
p	.11	.86	<.001^a	.32	.44	.014^a	.16^a
pMTG, IPS	3.12	<1	27.75	<1	2.65	4.42	44.74
p	.10	.94	<.001	.34	.09	.036^a	.10
LIFG, pMTG	<1	<1	41.34	<1	<1	7.58	1.01
p	.70	.44	<.001^a	.89	.68	.008^a	.38

Nonsemantic Conditions Only (Global and Local NavonTask)
df	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15	1, 15
LIFG, IPS	<1	<1	6.66	<1	<1	<1	<1
p	.76	.36	.02	.67	.56	.51	.51
pMTG, IPS	2.44	1.82	6.31	<1	1.27	1.30	<1
p	.14	.20	.02	.46	.28	.27	.57
LIFG, pMTG	1.49	<1	4.65	<1	<1	<1	<1
p	.24	.72	.048	.82	.77	.89	.68

Pairs of brain regions that were compared are listed in the first column.

^aSphericity-corrected (Huynh–Feldt).