MIT Press

Table 1.

Task Performance in Instructed Trials for Control and Inactivation Sessions

Monkey	Session	HF	Fixation Breaks (%)		Saccade Errors (%)		Overall Performance (%)		Latency (msec)
Monkey	Session	HF	Low Reward	High Reward	Low Reward	High Reward	Low Reward	High Reward	Low Reward	High Reward
F	Control	LH	15.6*	14.1*	5.9**	1.0**	79.5^,*	85.1^,*	304	300
	Inactivation	LH	25.8*	24.5*	12.4**	1.8**	65.5*	74.1*	306	302
	Control	RH	6.5^,*	14.2**	5.4*	3.3	88.5*	82.9	294^,*	282*
	Inactivation	RH	11.6*	11.5	13.9^,*	5.2**	76.2^,*	83.9**	307*	301*
R	Control	LH	25.5**	44.9**	2.0	5.0	72.8**	52.6**	234	224
	Inactivation	LH	20.1	48.6	1.7	0	74.5	51.5	238	224
	Control	RH	45.0^,*	60.0**	1.7	0	53.8^,*	39.9**	233*	224*
	Inactivation	RH	24.4*	47.3	1.82	6.5	74.8*	49.3	256*	245*

Monkey	Session	HF	Fixation Breaks (%)		Saccade Errors (%)		Overall Performance (%)		Latency (msec)
Monkey	Session	HF	Low Reward	High Reward	Low Reward	High Reward	Low Reward	High Reward	Low Reward	High Reward
F	Control	LH	15.6*	14.1*	5.9**	1.0**	79.5^,*	85.1^,*	304	300
	Inactivation	LH	25.8*	24.5*	12.4**	1.8**	65.5*	74.1*	306	302
	Control	RH	6.5^,*	14.2**	5.4*	3.3	88.5*	82.9	294^,*	282*
	Inactivation	RH	11.6*	11.5	13.9^,*	5.2**	76.2^,*	83.9**	307*	301*
R	Control	LH	25.5**	44.9**	2.0	5.0	72.8**	52.6**	234	224
	Inactivation	LH	20.1	48.6	1.7	0	74.5	51.5	238	224
	Control	RH	45.0^,*	60.0**	1.7	0	53.8^,*	39.9**	233*	224*
	Inactivation	RH	24.4*	47.3	1.82	6.5	74.8*	49.3	256*	245*

LH = left (ipsilesional) hemifield; RH = right (contralesional) hemifield. Significant inactivation effects are in bold.

^*p < .05 for comparison between control versus inactivation (separate two-tailed t tests within each reward condition and hemifield).

^**p < .05 for comparison between low reward versus high reward (separate two-tailed t tests within session and hemifield).