Skip to Main Content
Table 3. 

Task Performance in Instructed Trials in Control and Inactivation Sessions, for Low and High Contrast Trials

Monkey
Session
HF
Fixation Breaks (%)
Saccade Errors (%)
Overall Performance (%)
Latency (msec)
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Control LH 11.9 11.8* 8.6 2.9 80.2 85.6* 297 297 
Inactivation LH 25.1 27.5* 9.4 5.8 67.4 68.2* 303 303 
Control RH 7.0 11.2 10.1 6.5 83.5* 83.6 299 289 
Inactivation RH 15.9 18.6 22.2 9.9 64.8* 73.82 304 306 
Monkey
Session
HF
Fixation Breaks (%)
Saccade Errors (%)
Overall Performance (%)
Latency (msec)
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Low Contrast
High Contrast
Control LH 11.9 11.8* 8.6 2.9 80.2 85.6* 297 297 
Inactivation LH 25.1 27.5* 9.4 5.8 67.4 68.2* 303 303 
Control RH 7.0 11.2 10.1 6.5 83.5* 83.6 299 289 
Inactivation RH 15.9 18.6 22.2 9.9 64.8* 73.82 304 306 

Significant inactivation effects are printed in bold. None of the comparisons between low contrast versus high contrast reached significance (separate two-tailed t tests for within session and hemifield).

*p < .05 for comparison between control versus inactivation (separate two-tailed t tests within each contrast condition and session type).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal