Percent of Right Hemifield (Contralesional) Choices for Six Control and Six Inactivation Sessions as a Function of Saliency Manipulation
| Salience Manipulation . | Choices Towards RH (%) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control . | Inactivation . | |||||
| Low . | Equal . | High . | Low . | Equal . | High . | |
| Reward | 2 | 77 | 97 | 1 | 33 | 70 |
| Luminance | 23 | 72 | 90 | 7 | 22 | 40 |
| Salience Manipulation . | Choices Towards RH (%) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control . | Inactivation . | |||||
| Low . | Equal . | High . | Low . | Equal . | High . | |
| Reward | 2 | 77 | 97 | 1 | 33 | 70 |
| Luminance | 23 | 72 | 90 | 7 | 22 | 40 |
Reward and luminance manipulations were conducted in control and inactivation sessions in interleaved counterbalanced blocks within each session. Significant effects of manipulation in inactivation sessions are printed in bold.