Skip to Main Content
Table 2. 

Results for Associatively Related Distractors


RT
%
μ
σ
τ
IFG Stimulation 
Associatively related 692 (11) 2.4 (0.5) 587 (11) 45 (5) 105 (5) 
Unrelated 719 (12) 3.3 (0.6) 622 (11) 49 (7) 98 (8) 
 Difference −27*** (7) −0.9 (0.6) −35*** (6) −4 (5) 7 (9) 
 
MTG Stimulation 
Associatively related 695 (12) 2.6 (0.4) 589 (12) 43 (7) 107 (11) 
Unrelated 704 (8) 2.2 (0.5) 622 (9) 53 (6) 82 (7) 
 Difference −9 (7) 0.4 (0.5) −33** (9) −10 (8) 25* (12) 
 
No Stimulation (Sham) 
Associatively related 683 (11) 2.2 (0.5) 597 (13) 52 (6) 86 (8) 
Unrelated 706 (11) 2.4 (0.5) 612 (9) 48 (5) 97 (8) 
 Difference −23*** (5) −0.2 (0.5) −15 (9) 4 (8) −11 (10) 

RT
%
μ
σ
τ
IFG Stimulation 
Associatively related 692 (11) 2.4 (0.5) 587 (11) 45 (5) 105 (5) 
Unrelated 719 (12) 3.3 (0.6) 622 (11) 49 (7) 98 (8) 
 Difference −27*** (7) −0.9 (0.6) −35*** (6) −4 (5) 7 (9) 
 
MTG Stimulation 
Associatively related 695 (12) 2.6 (0.4) 589 (12) 43 (7) 107 (11) 
Unrelated 704 (8) 2.2 (0.5) 622 (9) 53 (6) 82 (7) 
 Difference −9 (7) 0.4 (0.5) −33** (9) −10 (8) 25* (12) 
 
No Stimulation (Sham) 
Associatively related 683 (11) 2.2 (0.5) 597 (13) 52 (6) 86 (8) 
Unrelated 706 (11) 2.4 (0.5) 612 (9) 48 (5) 97 (8) 
 Difference −23*** (5) −0.2 (0.5) −15 (9) 4 (8) −11 (10) 

Mean naming latencies (in msec), error rates (in percent), and ex-Gaussian parameters (μ, σ, τ) for the associatively related and unrelated conditions, separated by stimulation location and relatedness.

Standard errors of the mean are given in parentheses.

*p < .05.

**p < .01.

***p < .001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal