Skip to Main Content
Table 7.

Was human-labeled data used for training data or to evaluate a classifier trained on nonhuman-labeled training data?

 CountProportion
Human labeling for training data 94 91.26% 
Human labeling for evaluation only 5.83% 
Unsure 2.91% 
Total of applicable papers (assumed to use human-labeled training data) 103 100.00% 
Nonapplicable papers 97 – 
 CountProportion
Human labeling for training data 94 91.26% 
Human labeling for evaluation only 5.83% 
Unsure 2.91% 
Total of applicable papers (assumed to use human-labeled training data) 103 100.00% 
Nonapplicable papers 97 – 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal